Gender Roles of Microfinance Institutions’ Beneficiaries in Sorsogon City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21016/ICEPSS.2016.AP07WF149O

Keywords:

MFIs, beneficiaries, gender, roles

Abstract

The study setting is Sorsogon City’s Microfinance Institutions (MFIs), operating within the city, confronted with hold-ups, credit pollution (multiple borrowing of some beneficiaries), negative paying attitude of the borrowers, and coercive way of loan payments by center chief. Answers to problems: 1) gender profile of borrowers of MFIs; 2) reasons why men seldom borrow; 3) gender role in decision making; and 4) gender role in business management; and through descriptive-evaluative research methods, focused-group discussion, interview /documentary analysis; generated these findings: 1) MFI beneficiaries’ profile reflects that 74.58% are women (mothers), 18.33% are men (fathers), 2.92% are eldest sons, and 4.17% are eldest daughters; with high school education, belonging to poor families of 3 to 6 members; engaged in vending; 2) Fathers and males seldom avail of loans because : a) MFI is designed for mothers; b) fathers are busy to attend meetings and activities; 3) Mothers are given full authority to decide how to spend loan proceeds provided they are managed well and records kept for transparency; 4) Decision making is shared between fathers and mothers, with little participation from eldest sons and/or daughters; and mothers hold prime responsibility over the business with minimal participation from fathers and/or children. MFIs may: 1) Review their mission, vision, goals, lending policies and programs, and employ better modalities that include gender roles in the family since many fathers and children are unemployed; 2) Studies on gender-based business can be conducted to document success stories of borrowers to encourage family members to engage in productive roles; 3) Beneficiaries must be coached by the MFIs in business implementation and decision making to empower them and stop the cycle of borrowing within period of five (5) years.

References

Ablorh, W. (2011). Microfinance and Socio-Economic Empowerment of Women. A Case Opportunity International Savings and Loans, Clients, Dissertation. Institute of Distance Learning, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. Ghana, West Africa. | GS

Cabral, A. (2011). The Impact of Microfinance on the Capabilities of Participants, Ph.D. Thesis, School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, RMIT University. | GS

Dewan, A.H. & Alamgir. (2009). State of Microfinance in Bangladesh prepared for Institute of Microfinance as part of the project on State of Microfinance in SAARC Countries | GS

Eoin & Wren. (2005). Micro Finance Literature Review. Trocaire. | GS

Grameen Bank. (2000). Annual Report of the Grameen Bank. Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Halder, S.R. (2003). Poverty Outreach and BRAC’s Microfinance Interventions: Programme Impact and Sustainability. IDS Bulletin, 34, 44-53. | GS

Kaboski, J. & Townsend, R. (2002). Policies and Impact: An Analysis of Village-Level Microfinance Institutions. Mimeo, University of Chicago. | GS

Khander, S.R. (2005). Microfinance and Poverty: Data from Bangladesh. The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 19(2).

Ledgerwood, J. (1999). Microfinance Handbook: An Institutional and Financial Perspective. Washington D.C. | GS

Nonponen, H. & Kantor, P. (2004). Crises, Setback and Chronic Problems – The Determinants of Economic Stress Events Among Poor Households in India. Journal of International Development, 16, 529-545. | GS

Quinones, B. & Seibel, H.D. (2000). Social Capital in Microfinance: Case Studies in the Philippines. Policy Sciences, 33: 421-433. Kluwer Academic Publishers. | GS

Victor, O.O. & Ososuakpor, J. (2002). The Impact of Microfinance on Economic Development of Women in Edo State, Nigeria, Master Thesis. Department of Economics, Achiever University, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria.

Published

2016-10-23

How to Cite

Gender Roles of Microfinance Institutions’ Beneficiaries in Sorsogon City, Philippines . (2016). Conference Proceedings of Educational Paradigm, Systems and Strategies, 3(2), 172. https://doi.org/10.21016/ICEPSS.2016.AP07WF149O