Higher Education: A Privilege or a Right? It is Time for ODL Institutions to Shine

Authors

  • Dr. Apostolos Giannakopoulos University of South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21016/4.17.815.062O

Keywords:

privilege, right, open distance learning, ODL

Abstract

Globalisation and massification of higher education has given rise to a number of social and political discourses around the world. Countries are no longer independent of what is happening around them and around the world. Especially third world countries which have to maintain certain standards if they to compete in the open world markets. This places enormous responsibility on governments to ensure the citizens receive quality education and are on the same par, if not higher, as their counterparts in other parts of the world. The citizens on the other hand not only demand such education but they also demand such education to be free. While the right to basic education (up to Grade 12) has been accepted as a right by many countries including the United Nations, higher education though is going through a grey area. Literature shows that it is almost a 50-50 situation. From a student’s perspective it is a right. But human rights should be accompanied by responsibilities. From a pragmatic and institution’s perspective it is a privilege not because of discrimination (elite versus poor), but due to its sustainability which depends on academic success of students which is related to status and financial constraints. It will be argued that in the ideal situation where one gets 100% graduation rate then in the end the graduated student will be financing a new undergraduate which is a self-financing system. Anything less that 100% graduation rate leads to wastage of resources. It is this indisputable wastage that on the one hand governments and institutions have not been successful in addressing on the other hand misinformed students may make unrealistic demands. An Open Distance Learning (ODL) institution could take advantage of this, by using its advantages and providing quality education of acceptable standards to its self as well as to a F2F institution. It can become the bridge for the student to cross over to F2F institution, if he/ she wishes to do so, or retain the student and graduate at that institution.

References

Astin, A.W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc. | GS

Bean, J.P. (1982). Student attrition, intentions and confidence: Interaction effects in a path model. Research in Higher Education, 17(4): pp 291-320. | GS

Beer, C., & Lawson, C. (2016). The problem of student attrition in higher education: An alternative perspective. Journal of Further and Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2016.1177171. | GS DOI CR

Breier, M., & Mabizela, M. (2008). Higher Education. HSRC Press, Cape Town, South Africa .

Buckley, S., & Giannakopoulos, A. (2014). Sustainability of Open Distance E-Learning Institutions as Knowledge Producers: A Theoretical Perspective. ECKM2014-Proceedings of the 15th European conference on Knowledge Management ,Volume One, 173. | GS

Eybers, S., & Giannakopoulos, A. (2015). Student Engagement in an Online Environment: Are we Trying to Mimic Contact Education? A South African Perspective. Proceedings from eLEOT 2015 - 2nd EAI International Conference on e-Learning e-Education and Online Training, September 16-18 - Novedrate, Italy. | GS

Hu, H., & Driscoll, M. P. (2013). Self-Regulation in e-Learning Environments: A Remedy for Community College?. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 171-184. | GS

Hülsmann, T. (2016). The impact of ICT on the costs and economics of distance education: A review of the literature. | GS

McKeown, R. (2002). Education for Sustainable Development Toolkit. | GS

O’Neill, K., Singh, G., & O’Donoghue, J. (2004). Implementing eLearning Programmes for Higher Education: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Information Technology Education, 3. | GS

Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Jossey Bass, San Francisco. | GS

Prinsloo, P. (2009). Modeling Throughput at Unisa: The Key to the Successful Implementation of ODL. Unisa, Department of Information and Strategic Analysis (DISA), Unisa, Pretoria. | GS

Shirky, C. (2014, January 29). The end of higher education’s golden age [Blog post]. Clay Shirky. | GS

Rumble, G. (2014). The costs and economics of online distance education. In O. Zawacki-Richter & T. Andersen (Eds.),Online distance education: Towards a research agenda (pp. 197–216). Edmonton: Athabasca University Press. | GS

Smith, P. J. (2005). Editorial. Distance education: Past contributions and possible futures. Distance Education, 26,159–163. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587910500168819. | GS DOI CR

Strydom, J.E., & Mentz, M. (2010). Focusing the Student Experience on Success through Student Engagement. Council on Higher Education, Pretoria. | GS

Sweet, R. (1986). Student Dropout in Distance Education: An Application of Tinto's Model. Distance Education, 7(2), 201-213. | GS

Tait, A., & Mills, R. (Eds). (1999). The convergence of distance and conventional education: Patterns of flexibility for the individual learner. London: Routledge. | GS

Tinto, V. (2016). From retention to persistence. | GS

Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1993). | GS

Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from Higher Education. Review of Educational research, 45(1), 89-125. | GS

Published

2017-11-23

How to Cite

Giannakopoulos, A. (2017). Higher Education: A Privilege or a Right? It is Time for ODL Institutions to Shine. Conference Proceedings of Educational Paradigm, Systems and Strategies, 4(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.21016/4.17.815.062O